
Resolve
disputes with
the engagement
record in view.
ZoikoRum is designed to connect a dispute to the scope, versions, messages, deliverables, acceptance decisions and relevant payment state behind the engagement — so the applicable process can proceed with clearer evidence and a traceable record.
Available process, mediation or other resolution routes, payment treatment and timing vary by governing terms, program and jurisdiction.
- SOW v4Contracts
- Deliverable · sub. 2Milestones
- Review threadMessages
- Case filedBuyer · [time]
- Response submittedProfessional · [time]
- Evidence requestedCase operations
Neutral by design.
Explainable at every step.
Five principles that shape every case — without promising a particular outcome.

The record travels with the case
Relevant engagement evidence stays connected instead of being reconstructed across disconnected tools.
The process is visible
Authorized participants can see case status, requested actions and the applicable route.
Payment state is not hidden
Where supported, holds or release restrictions are shown with their current reason and owner.
Routes are disclosed, not assumed
Mediation or other routes appear only when they apply under the governing terms and supported program.

Important actions leave evidence
Filing, submissions, case events and resolution state can remain part of the engagement record.
Common engagement issues,
framed neutrally.
Select an issue to see how it is framed and the guardrail that applies.
“The delivered work does not match the agreed scope or milestone.”
Six governed stages,
from filing to record.
Case readiness + filing form
- Eligible engagement
- Disputed item and version
- Issue and requested outcome
One case. Every source,
status and next action.
Click completed stages, open evidence, and preview the outcome-recorded state.Show outcome-recorded state
- Status
- Evidence gathering
- Parties
- Buyer · Professional
- Disputed
- Milestone 2 · SOW v4
- Process
- Facilitated review
- Opened
- [date]
Case operations requested evidence linking submission 2 to each acceptance criterion. Due date shown only if configured.
Open evidence room- Issue category
- Acceptance disagreement
- Filer statement
- “Submission 2 does not meet the agreed acceptance criteria for the board reporting pack.”
- Requested outcome
- Revision against criteria · a request, not a promise
- Process
- Facilitated review · terms v[n]
- Program
- [Jurisdiction / program qualifier]
- Source-linkedStatement of Work v4Contracts · SOW v4
- Source-linkedMilestone 2 acceptance criteriaContracts · Milestone 2 · v2
- SubmittedDeliverable · submission 2Milestones · Milestone 2 · sub. 2
- Source-linkedAcceptance decision · changes requestedMilestones · Milestone 2 · decision
- [t5]Evidence linked · SOW v4System · Contracts
- [t4]Evidence requestedCase operations · Dispute Resolution
- [t3]Response submittedProfessional · Dispute Resolution
- [t2]Payment hold appliedSystem · Payment Protection
- [t1]Case filedBuyer · Dispute Resolution
Source: Payment Protection · last update [timestamp] · read-only
Why is this held?Safety concerns route to Trust & Safety.
Know what applies
before you file.
Seven screens, with the payment effect and process disclosed before submit — never after.
Select engagement
Anchor the filing to an eligible engagement.
- Engagement search or list
- Professional / firm and status
- Market / program
- Eligible dispute-route indicator
- Eligible engagementExact engagement and supported path.
- Disputed object selectedExact object and version.
- Process disclosedName, stages, terms, qualifier.
- Payment effect disclosedNever a surprise after submit.
- Evidence availabilityExisting sources and missing items.
- Privacy warningWho may see submissions.
- Outcome realismA request, not a promise.
- Final reviewReadable summary before filing.
Source-linked evidence,
with provenance.
An upload is never treated as verified truth. Every item shows where it came from and who can see it.
- Statement of Work v4Source-linkedContract · Contracts · SOW v4 · linked by SystemVisible to: Buyer · Professional
- Milestone 2 acceptance criteriaSource-linkedMilestone · Contracts · Milestone 2 · v2 · linked by SystemVisible to: Buyer · Professional
- Deliverable · submission 2SubmittedDeliverable · Milestones · Milestone 2 · sub. 2 · linked by ProfessionalVisible to: Buyer · Professional
- Acceptance decision · changes requestedSource-linkedAcceptance · Milestones · Milestone 2 · decision · linked by Finance LeadVisible to: Buyer · Professional
- Review feedback threadSource-linkedMessage · Messages · Thread · Milestone 2 · linked by SystemVisible to: Buyer · Professional
- Payment state · release restrictedSource-linkedPayment · Payment Protection · Milestone 2 · funding case · linked by SystemVisible to: Buyer · Professional
- Variance analysis notesSubmittedParty submission · Professional · — · linked by ProfessionalVisible to: Buyer · Professional · Case operations
- Deliverable · submission 1SupersededDeliverable · Milestones · Milestone 2 · sub. 1 · linked by ProfessionalVisible to: Buyer · Professional
- Internal budget memoRestrictedParty submission · Buyer organization · — · linked by Org dispute contactVisible to: Organization-only
| Evidence | Type | Source | Object / version | Linked by | Visibility | Integrity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statement of Work v4 | Contract | Contracts | SOW v4 | System | Buyer · Professional | Source-linked |
| Milestone 2 acceptance criteria | Milestone | Contracts | Milestone 2 · v2 | System | Buyer · Professional | Source-linked |
| Deliverable · submission 2 | Deliverable | Milestones | Milestone 2 · sub. 2 | Professional | Buyer · Professional | Submitted |
| Acceptance decision · changes requested | Acceptance | Milestones | Milestone 2 · decision | Finance Lead | Buyer · Professional | Source-linked |
| Review feedback thread | Message | Messages | Thread · Milestone 2 | System | Buyer · Professional | Source-linked |
| Payment state · release restricted | Payment | Payment Protection | Milestone 2 · funding case | System | Buyer · Professional | Source-linked |
| Variance analysis notes | Party submission | Professional | — | Professional | Buyer · Professional · Case operations | Submitted |
| Deliverable · submission 1 | Deliverable | Milestones | Milestone 2 · sub. 1 | Professional | Buyer · Professional | Superseded |
| Internal budget memo | Party submission | Buyer organization | — | Org dispute contact | Organization-only | Restricted |
Actions are permissioned and logged: open detail · add note if allowed · request clarification · download if permitted. There is no “edit source truth.”
The effect on money —
shown, not executed here.

Filing a dispute does not automatically stop or refund payment. Treatment depends on the supported mechanism, governing terms, program and case state — shown before or immediately after filing where known.
The route that applies
— and only that one.
No case is assumed to receive mediation, arbitration or platform adjudication.

Direct resolution / clarification
Party-to-party clarification before escalation, when the governing process supports it.
Continue discussion
Platform-facilitated review
What the platform reviews and what authority it has are stated only where approved.
Review processMediation
Provider or process, cost responsibility and consequences come only from approved terms and configuration.
See mediation termsOther resolution route
The approved route name is shown — never an inferred “arbitration” or “binding decision.”
View applicable processExternal / legal route
If governing terms direct parties elsewhere, the handoff is explained without legal advice.
View terms / Get supportProcedural balance,
for both sides.

- Symmetric case definitionBoth parties see the same disputed object, version and process label.
- No accusatory defaults“Issue,” “response,” “evidence,” “outcome” — never “offender” or “guilty.”
- Reasoned actionsRequests, holds, deadlines and outcomes carry a readable basis.
- Notice and participationEach party sees whether action is required, and when — not only by email.
- Access controlEvidence is visible only to authorized participants.
- Record integrityCorrections create traceable amendments, not silent deletion.
- No outcome guaranteeNo promise of success, refund, payment or dispute elimination.

AI may help summarize or organize permitted information. Consequential dispute outcomes remain subject to defined human or policy authority and appropriate oversight.

Authority, policy and
access — kept explicit.
Organization role context
Requester, engagement owner, budget owner, acceptance authority and dispute contacts shown when relevant.
Policy context
The policy profile affecting routing or evidence is displayed; Policy Engine stays authoritative.
Access segregation
Case participants can differ from general engagement viewers; sensitive evidence is restricted by need.
Approval handoff
Settlement, refund or payment actions needing organizational approval route to Approval Workflows.
Audit-ready record
Source-linked timeline and authorized export through Audit & Reporting.
Exception discipline
No invisible override. Every exception is explicit, permissioned, reasoned and recorded.
Roles, permissions & separation of duties
- Buyer / requesterView
Own permitted case and evidence.
Create / submitFile, respond, submit permitted evidence.
Decide / administerNo platform/process authority by default.
- Professional / firmView
Own permitted case and evidence.
Create / submitRespond; submit permitted evidence.
Decide / administerNo platform/process authority by default.
- Org dispute contactView
Organization-authorized cases per policy.
Create / submitCoordinate evidence where authorized.
Decide / administerManages participation, not platform outcome.
- Payment approver / financeView
Payment-state projection as authorized.
Create / submitActs in the authoritative payment/approval flow.
Decide / administerCannot change dispute evidence or history.
- Case operationsView
Assigned cases and operational metadata.
Create / submitRequest information; manage configured tasks.
Decide / administerLimited to the approved operating model.
- Mediator / external reviewerView
Only assigned case content permitted by process.
Create / submitSubmit process events/outcome as permitted.
Decide / administerNo broader organization access.
- Auditor / compliance viewerView
Read-only authorized records and reports.
Create / submitNone.
Decide / administerNo mutation.
- System administratorView
Configuration metadata within scope.
Create / submitNo party evidence editing by virtue of role.
Decide / administerChanges auditable; no silent case-result edits.
| Role | View | Create / submit | Decide / administer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyer / requester | Own permitted case and evidence. | File, respond, submit permitted evidence. | No platform/process authority by default. |
| Professional / firm | Own permitted case and evidence. | Respond; submit permitted evidence. | No platform/process authority by default. |
| Org dispute contact | Organization-authorized cases per policy. | Coordinate evidence where authorized. | Manages participation, not platform outcome. |
| Payment approver / finance | Payment-state projection as authorized. | Acts in the authoritative payment/approval flow. | Cannot change dispute evidence or history. |
| Case operations | Assigned cases and operational metadata. | Request information; manage configured tasks. | Limited to the approved operating model. |
| Mediator / external reviewer | Only assigned case content permitted by process. | Submit process events/outcome as permitted. | No broader organization access. |
| Auditor / compliance viewer | Read-only authorized records and reports. | None. | No mutation. |
| System administrator | Configuration metadata within scope. | No party evidence editing by virtue of role. | Changes auditable; no silent case-result edits. |
Filing, evidence, timeline
and resolution — connected.

- Filing
- Case reference, disputed object/version, issue category, requested outcome
- Evidence
- Source-linked items with provenance and visibility
- Timeline
- Material events with actor, source and time
- Resolution state
- Outcome, authority, explanation, recorded time
- Downstream refs
- Payment, refund and contract action references — never fabricated completion
- Retention
- Subject to governing retention and access rules
Recommended case states
Recommendation · Not yet live
Process availability,
stated before use.
Process, payment protection, mediation and other features can vary by jurisdiction, market and program terms.
Applicable terms
Versioned terms, dispute route, privacy and legal links are shown for your context.
No legal advice
ZoikoRum explains handoffs; it does not advise on legal rights.
Data protection
Submissions follow privacy rules; avoid uploading irrelevant sensitive data.
No outcome guarantee
Infrastructure for process and evidence — not a promised result.
Respond with evidence
Review with context
Resolve with a record
Resolve with clearer evidence.
Get help with a case, understand a payment state, or set up governance for your organization.
ZoikoRum provides process, evidence and payment-workflow infrastructure and does not promise a particular outcome, refund, payment or professional result. Availability varies by jurisdiction, market and program terms.
